Reply to "Open House Discussion with Sharat"

blowout.dealz
Community Member
Hi All,

This thread is opened because I new posts have been locked in the thread "Open House Discussion with Sharat, Sr Manager Trust&Safety, 29 Sep, 4-5 PM". Quoting a reply in the thread which can be viewed on the link below:

http://forums.ebay.in/thread.jspa?threadID=600001138&start=40

"On SNP there are lots of suggestions for various sellers and in the past we did make few changes, however we feel we need to change this significantly in such a way that genuine sellers are able to provide proof"

I absolutely agree with this, there is a real need to change the way sellers are required to prove that they are genuine. Options such as ODR India and Square Trade are very tedious and time consuming, and practically do not serve the purpose as they charge exorbitant amounts for assisted negations where a 3rd party resolves the dispute.

A suggestion from my side: If a buyer gives a negative feedback, it should be compulsory for the buyer to open an online dispute too. And if the buyer does not respond to a INR or SNAD complaint for 15 days, the case should be closed in the seller's favour and the feedback removed. And if the seller does not reply, then the case should be closed in the buyer's favour and the seller should be suspended for not responding to the dispute for such a long time.

Another suggestion (which I feel may be a bit harder to implement): An eBay TnS team member should look into the dispute case if requested by the buyer or the seller. if the seller is right, the case should be closed in the seller's favour. If the buyer is right, the seller should be made to provide the replacement/refund as required by the buyer, and also charged Rs.500 by eBay for the services provided by the TnS team. I am sure no genuine seller would mind paying this amount if he is wrong, and this way even eBay's extra TnS team expenses will be covered from such sellers. It would be a win-win situation for everyone involved.

It would be great if all sellers who read this thread can reply with their views on my suggestions and also provide some more suggestions on this topic.

Regards,

Deepak M.
Blowout Dealz.
Message 1 of 5
latest reply
4 REPLIES 4

Reply to "Open House Discussion with Sharat"

touchnshine
Community Member

I totally agree with
blowout.dealz...





 

Message 2 of 5
latest reply

Reply to "Open House Discussion with Sharat"

Hello,
I am totally agree with the suggestions of blowout.dealz.

Genuine Sellers do not have any problem if anything like such can be implemented.


I hope more sellers will put their views/suggestions.

With Regards,
Deep Agarwal.
Shree Krishna Gems



Message 3 of 5
latest reply

Reply to "Open House Discussion with Sharat"

blowout.dealz
Community Member
Well, no reply from eBay as yet. Hope we can get an early reply from them
Message 4 of 5
latest reply

Reply to "Open House Discussion with Sharat"

superstores_tech
Community Member
Atleast Negative ratings shoudl not be counted as disputed while resolving SNP.

This has been a major issue.

When a buyer has an issue he can open a dispute.

Whereas a -ve feedback can be left for anyreason such as late shipment of product. This is not a dispute but a feedback.

Still i have given up on giving suggestions to ebay and community discussions as i feel at the end of the day these MNC;s are here to make money ... they arent really here to help us.

ALl this community and and feelings are fake and created to grow their business !! Superstores_Tech

Ankur Agarwal
Superstores_Tech

Ankur Agarwal
Message 5 of 5
latest reply