SELLERS GET UNITED NEED FOR MASS STRIKE <b></b> MUST STOP LISTING

[rajesh.parekh-kings.international]

LET US ALL GET UNITED AND CLOSE ALL OUR LISTINGS TILL this Black feedback policy is removed.

We need to get united and show ebay.in that what is wrong and unjustified cant be accepted by any one of us.

We must raise our voice against this unjustified policy. I don't want to specify the names but many of the top ebay.in employees are also against this and accepted that it is unfair for sellers.


LET ebay.in also understand that by bringing such policy it is not only sellers will be affected but Ebay.in will also loose the listing charges and commissions when 98% of listings will be closed. Ebay must realised it is because of us the genuine sellers they are living and buyers are here because of us and not because of their policies.

SELLERS GET UNITED NEED FOR MASS STRIKE

[indraneel@ebay.com]

Hello Rajesh (Princesswalkeshwar_in1),

As rightly called out by Hitesh your Feedback percentage is 98.8% and is now correctly being displayed on your listings page as well.

As mentioned in the announcement, some sellers may notice a discrepancy between their Feedback percentage on the item page and on their Feedback Profile page – this is a temporary condition as we complete the system changes, and this information will be in sync again shortly.


Thanks & Regards,
Indraneel

[pc_gaming_store]

Indraneel said:

"Also as mentioned in our responses on this thread we have taken/will taken action against buyers who provide unjustified Feedbacks to our sellers. This will ensure that only justified negative/neutral feedback is left by the buyers."

But, when a buyer leaving negative feedback case was given by esmartbazaar on http://forums.ebay.in/thread.jspa?threadID=600002363&tstart=0&mod=1211533555423, the reply by Indraneel t say the least was pathetic and clearly reflected the inability or maybe 'I don't care' nature of eBay when a withdrawal situation would arise.

Therefore, Indraneel, while I know this is not in your hands and you cannot do anything about the policies as this has been decided by a higher hierarchy, I request you not to go about making frivolous comments or make wilfull misrepresented statements to take off the heat, because at the end of the day, the statements we all make are based on our free will and more importantly our moral character.

[indraneel@ebay.com]

Hello pc_gaming_store,

I'd request you to refer to the threads below wherein we have taken necessary actions against the members who had provided unjustified feedbacks to some of the sellers and the same has been removed and acknowledged by the sellers.

I am speachless by trust & safetly department reply!

Fraud Buyers. All Sellers please be aware !

Hope this indicates that the statements that are being made by us are also backed by the necessary actions.



Regards,
Indraneel

[pc_gaming_store]

Hello Indraneel,

Thak you for your reply.

We have just noticed the maximum we can block is a buyer with a minimum of 4 policy violations in the past 6 months?

What's the use of this? Why can't we choose to block a buyer with 2 policy violations in the past 6 months or past 12 months? Especially when you are measuring sellers for past 12 months performance, why not buyers?