Dear veedeedirect
Thanks for your post and the points you have raised and let me answer in the same order
1) Yes there are cases where buyers would have not paid and still filed an INR, however when we look at such instances they are far fewer than the number of cases filed where buyers would have paid and not received their product.
2) As mentioned on a separate post the reduction in timeline would help in resolving the dispute. Yes there are situation where buyer not confirm that the issue is resolved, however we review the proof provided by the seller and mark the case as resolved.
In these situations the seller’s recent record helps the person to take the judgment, the case what you mentioned is valid when there is only 1 dispute against the seller and the other record is impeccable
3) Yes I agree and if the dispute is filed after giving the feedback then we would treat the dispute and not consider the feedback . This process has been fixed
We are noticing that there are even Power Sellers who have disputes being filed against them hence we cannot say Power Sellers would not be Non Performing Sellers.
Regards
Yash
Regards
Yash