Dear cellphonewala
Thanks for the post and you have articulated the concerns related to suspensions.
Most seller suspensions happen after warnings and the challenge we face is very few sellers take these warnings seriously and correct. There have been instances where violations have been done due to ignorance and warnings have been ignored which lead to suspensions
We have launched policy tutorials and also revamped most of the policy pages to make them easier to understand
Post warning we normally suspend the seller, currently we are evaluating the options of an intermittent step prior suspension
All policies are not same hence a acceptable practice in ebay.com may will be treated as violation in India. example contact information. Again we should have a relook at some of these policies and where required we are open to modify some of them
Regarding Buyer Protection timeline of 90 days is more towards the claim process, there are situations when buyers dont escalate for a claim and the dispute is closed by the system. Based on the feedback, complaints filed we do send warnings to sellers so that the buyers have a better experience on the site.
The discussion we currently having is of how old the cases need to resolved by the seller, challenges in getting POD will be looked so that genuine sellers are not warned for SNP
Currently Square Trade in not in India and using their service is also expensive. We are currently are in the final stages of having a 3rd party service provider who can resolve these disputes and at lower price. We shall be making an announcement of this once the arrangement is complete
If I look at the post made by sood_computers in ebay need to ensure we have trusted platform we have to monitor the site for fraudulent behaviour and block certain users based on their profile. I agree, we need to revisit the SNP warnings and the challenge some genuine sellers faced for cases which are very old
Regards
Yash
Regards
Yash