on 18-04-2016 12:35 PM
Hi,
Why should be a seller deprived of a positive feed back say after a month or two of not receiving any feed back.
The seller would have exercise his options if the product was not working of acceptable to him.
For example look at the state of the seller.
Let us say
Sold 500 pieces
Received positive feed backs 50
Received negative feed back 5
Members postive feed back percentage is 90%
This is not the true picture of the seller
He has 445 buyers who have not left a feed back.
Had they left a positive feed back the percentage would have been 99%.
Just imagine the boost in sales figure of the seller and the traffic to Ebay.
Regards,
Laptoplcdscreens
Right about it.
Just like ebay treats Item as Delivered if no response from Buyer so ebay should also treat the NOT LEFT feedback as POSITIVE Feedback. 95% of Buyer do not know how to leave feedback and even If they know how to leave they do not care to leave feedback as they do not have complain against the seller or Buyer lazyiness.
Ebay should impliment it.
On Buyer feedback receiving side different scenario : Seller can only leave +ve feedback or No Feedback and both treats as +VE feedback. There's no way Buyer feedback gets reduced.
I get only 5% feedback of sold items every month and 95% gets wasted. When in this 5% when 1 gives -ve feedback percentage gets down. If these 95% buyer wakesup then Seller performance or feedback percentage would hardly get below 99%
Hope ebay do the justification on feedback balancing. If Seller cannot post -ve feedback to buyer then at least buyers feedback who do not leave any feedback should be automatically posted as +ve on seller after some waiting duration.